Coinme Slapped with $300K Fine for Violating California's Crypto ATM Regulations

by:WolfOfWeb31 month ago
370
Coinme Slapped with $300K Fine for Violating California's Crypto ATM Regulations

When Crypto ATMs Meet Regulatory Reality

As someone who’s built DeFi protocols, I’ve always said: regulators might move slow, but they never forget. Coinme just learned this the hard way with a $300k settlement for violating California’s Financial Code sections 2102 and 32100.

The Compliance Breakdown

  • Transaction Limits: CA caps crypto ATM purchases at $1,000/day per customer. Coinme processed larger transactions across its 300+ kiosks.
  • Missing Disclosures: Receipts lacked required fee/risk warnings - basic stuff we enforce in smart contract UX.

Why This Matters

California represents ~12% of US crypto ATM installations (Coin ATM Radar data). Their Financial Code treats crypto kiosks like money transmitters - requiring:

  1. Daily limits to curb fraud/money laundering
  2. Physical disclosures comparable to traditional ATMs

python

Pseudocode for compliant crypto ATM logic

def process_transaction(user, amount):

if amount > 1000 or daily_total[user] + amount > 1000:
    raise ComplianceError("CA daily limit exceeded")
# Continue transaction...

The Bigger Picture

This fine comes as the SEC sues major exchanges. My prediction? 2024 will be the year of ‘compliant DeFi’ - where operators either:

  • Build regulatory checks into their protocols (like our work with Chainlink Proof-of-Reserve)
  • Face escalating penalties from agencies now treating crypto like traditional finance

The elderly victim restitution ($51,700) particularly stings - proving that even in decentralized systems, someone always pays for non-compliance.

WolfOfWeb3

Likes27.07K Fans4.21K

Hot comment (1)

LunaWhale
LunaWhaleLunaWhale
1 month ago

When your crypto ATM gets schooled by regulators 🎓

Looks like Coinme just paid $300k for the ‘How Not To Run a Crypto Kiosk’ masterclass. Missing disclosures? Exceeding limits? In California? That’s like bringing a knife to a regulatory gunfight.

As a DeFi builder, I’d say their Python pseudocode missed one crucial line: if location == 'California': print('Good luck with that')

The real kicker? $51k going to elderly victims. Even in crypto grandpa always wins. 💸

Drop your hottest compliance fail stories below! 👇 #DeFiDrama

812
21
0